Further consideration may be merited if a reviewer made substantial errors of fact or there is significant evidence of bias, but only if a reversal of that reviewer's opinion would have changed the original decision. 3. Changes of authorship by adding or deleting authors, and/or changes in Corresponding Author, and/or changes in the sequence of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript. The decision on whether to proceed to peer review in such cases is at the Editor's discretion. You can also use our free Grammar Check tool for an evaluation of your work. However, on occasion editors might consult with expert researchers when deciding whether to review a paper. 6. Please note that changes to authorship cannot be made after acceptance of a manuscript. We first read and discuss each manuscript in light of our editorial criteria and . a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the issues raised by the editor and peer reviewers, a response to each of the reviewers, replying to each of the points raised. Reviewers read the manuscript and submit their reports. See also Authorship Principles. 2002 . Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest, Research involving Human Participants and/or Animals, Partial financial support was received from []. Authors are encouraged to include a statement that specifies the contribution of every author to the research and preparation of the manuscript. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles The above should be summarized in a statement and placed in a Declarations section before the reference list under a heading of Ethics approval. You must have received the manuscript ID by now. The manuscript should not be submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration. Other declarations include Ethics approval, Consent, Data, Material and/or Code availability and Authors contribution statements. If the manuscript is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author. The aspect of confidentiality as well as any wishes from the deceased should be respected. ). This is more confusing as generally, 'Manuscript Under consideration' means that the editor is considering the manuscript for peer review. Figures in online appendices [Supplementary Information (SI)] should, however, be numbered separately. Examples include creation of harmful consequences of biological agents or toxins, disruption of immunity of vaccines, unusual hazards in the use of chemicals, weaponization of research/technology (amongst others). For example, masking the eye region in photographs of participants is inadequate protection of anonymity. You will need to log in; if you do not have an account, you will be able to register for one when you submit. If it goes for review, then it will be about a month before you get the comments. Sample statements for Consent to publish: The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in Figure(s) 1a, 1b and 1c. Part of Please be aware that some publishers do not grant electronic rights for free and that Springer will not be able to refund any costs that may have occurred to receive these permissions. If the manuscript is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author. Journal reference: 1. Identify all elements found in the figure in the figure caption; and use boxes, circles, etc., as coordinate points in graphs. Review articles therefore require a disclosure statement.Other article types such as editorials, book reviews, comments (amongst others) may, dependent on their content, require a disclosure statement. http://www.springernature.com/gp/group/data-policy/faq. All lines should be at least 0.1 mm (0.3 pt) wide. , . For research involving animals, their data or biological material, authors should supply detailed information on the ethical treatment of their animals in their submission. After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should . If your manuscript contains any individual persons data in any form (including any individual details, images or videos), consent for publication must be obtained from that person, or in the case of children, their parent or legal guardian. Please prepare the article as a Microsoft Word document. Figure captions begin with the term Fig. This is in particular applicable to case studies. Editors decide whether to send a manuscript for peer review based on the degree to which it advances our understanding of the field, the soundness of conclusions, the extent to which the evidence presented - including appropriate data and analyses - supports these conclusions, and the wide relevance of these conclusions to the journals readership. Hope this helps. When reporting a study that involved human participants, their data or biological material, authors should include a statement that confirms that the study was approved (or granted exemption) by the appropriate institutional and/or national research ethics committee (including the name of the ethics committee) and certify that the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. I submitted to Nature Neuroscience about 9 days ago and it's been "under consideration" for about a week. Examples include: translations or a manuscript that is intended for a different group of readers. Authors are required to disclose financial or non-financial interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication. If a study was granted exemption or did not require ethics approval, this should also be detailed in the manuscript. on 21 May, 2021. In the case of a desk rejection, authors are notified within the first few days. Review articles and mini-reviews are most welcome. The purpose of the proof is to check for typesetting or conversion errors and the completeness and accuracy of the text, tables and figures. MS Office files are also acceptable. providing transparency on re-use of material and mention any unpublished material (for example manuscripts in press) included in the manuscript in a cover letter to the Editor; making sure disclosures, declarations and transparency on data statements from all authors are included in the manuscript as appropriate (see above). Short communications should begin with a short abstract of up to 100 words. A cover letter must accompany the submission giving the rationale for publication in Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, particularly with respect to the originality, scientific merit and importance to the field of Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of University C. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Authors have an obligation to correct mistakes once they discover a significant error or inaccuracy in their published article. Employment: Recent (while engaged in the research project), present or anticipated employment by any organization that may gain or lose financially through publication of this manuscript. ISSN 1546-1696 (online) With them, we emphasize our interest in expanding our presence in biotechnology research. In case of data acquired via a biobank/biorepository, it is possible they apply a broad consent which allows research participants to consent to a broad range of uses of their data and samples which is regarded by research ethics committees as specific enough to be considered informed. Data protection, confidentiality and privacy. The editor is reading your manuscript and figuring out whether or not she wants to send it for peer review. Our Community Voices series aims to highlight the challenges faced by under-represented groups in scientific research and to provide a . All figures have descriptive captions (blind users could then use a text-to-speech software or a text-to-Braille hardware), Patterns are used instead of or in addition to colors for conveying information (color-blind users would then be able to distinguish the visual elements), Any figure lettering has a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1. Disclosure of interests provides a complete and transparent process and helps readers form their own judgments of potential bias. [deleted] 4 yr. ago. The decision whether such information should be included is not only dependent on the scope of the journal, but also the scope of the article. [CDATA[> This work was supported by [] (Grant numbers [] and []. Definition: a combination of halftone and line art, e.g., halftones containing line drawing, extensive lettering, color diagrams, etc. Can you put your timelines? Reuse of images: If images are being reused from prior publications, the Publisher will assume that the prior publication obtained the relevant information regarding consent. Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs. Decisions are reversed on appeal only if the editors are convinced that the original decision was an error. But what I don't understand is the difference between editorial decision started and manuscipt under consideration. ->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration . ), Humana, Totowa, NJ, pp. Authors should provide the appropriate attribution for republished images. 42, 207219. 2: Nucleic Acids (Walker, J. Individual participants in studies have, for example, the right to decide what happens to the (identifiable) personal data gathered, to what they have said during a study or an interview, as well as to any photograph that was taken. In many instances authors will need to secure written consent before including images. The experts at Springer Nature Author Services can help you with manuscript preparationincluding English language editing, developmental comments, manuscript formatting, figure preparation, translation, and more. Gaastra, W. (1984), in Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. Halftones should have a minimum resolution of 300 dpi. Why is my manuscript still "Under consideration" even though it has already been 19 days? Reasons for changes in authorship should be explained in detail. Once you have submitted your manuscript, it goes through our editorial process. Authors are requested to disclose interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication. I recently submitted a paper to a Nature journal. RRIDs are provided by the Resource Identification Portal. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents. If you are unsure whether your paper is in scope for Nature Biotechnology, you can submit a presubmission enquiry, providing an abstract of your work.You can do this in our online Manuscript . These submissions are subject to the exact same review process as any other manuscript. If the manuscript has been peer-reviewed, authors should include a note explaining any changes made to the manuscript compared to the original Nature Sustainability submission, along with a separate point-by-point response to the reviewer reports. ). Type manuscript in English, double-spaced on numbered pages with 1- to 1.5-inch margins. Variance of type size within an illustration should be minimal, e.g., do not use 8-pt type on an axis and 20-pt type for the axis label. Springer Nature Author Services , , , , . Please note that submissions that do not include required statements will be returned as incomplete. Cite in the text by italic Arabic numerals in parentheses, set on the text line, numbered in the order they appear. Please refer to the Competing Interests section below for more information on how to complete these sections. How can you help improve your manuscript for publication? For articles that are based primarily on the students dissertation or thesis, it is recommended that the student is usually listed as principal author: A Graduate Students Guide to Determining Authorship Credit and Authorship Order, APA Science Student Council 2006. The trial registration number (TRN), date of registration and the words 'retrospectively registered should be included as the last line of the manuscript abstract. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. The above should be summarized in a statement and placed in a Declarations section before the reference list under a heading of Funding and/or Competing interests. How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? This may be a correction or retraction. Checklists are available for a number of study designs, including: Randomised trials (CONSORT) and Study protocols (SPIRIT), Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and protocols (Prisma-P), Diagnostic/prognostic studies (STARD) and (TRIPOD), Clinical practice guidelines (AGREE) and (RIGHT). Review articles present an expert synthesis of evidence and may be treated as an authoritative work on a subject. Answered by Editage Insights has received research support from Company A., The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.. Specifically this graph shows that the ratio of peer-reviewed vs. submitted manuscripts is floating around 13%. This is because you have been informed that your paper is under consideration for publication. The following statements must be included in your submitted manuscript under the heading 'Statements and Declarations'. Some authors ask the editors to reconsider a rejection decision. Editorial Board Members are welcome to submit papers to the journal. Your cover letter must include a valid institutional email address for each author. Research Resource Identifiers (RRID) are persistent unique identifiers (effectively similar to a DOI) for research resources. dual use of research). 17 . Color art is free of charge for print and online publication. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Non-financial interests: In addition, authors are requested to disclose interests that go beyond financial interests that could impart bias on the work submitted for publication such as professional interests, personal relationships or personal beliefs (amongst others). Under certain circumstances consent is not required as long as information is anonymized and the submission does not include images that may identify the person. Financial interests: Stocks or shares in companies (including holdings of spouse and/or children) that may gain or lose financially through publication of this manuscript; consultation fees or other forms of remuneration from organizations that may gain or lose financially; patents or patent applications whose value may be affected by publication of this manuscript. Corrections, Expressions of Concern and Retractions. Before submitting your article check the instructions following this section carefully. On day 4 they told the corresponding author that a subject editor had been assigned to handle my manuscript. Editorial Board Members and Editors are required to declare any competing interests and may be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists. Similarly, disputes on factual issues need not be resolved unless they would have altered the final decision to publish or not. We consulted extensively with the IRB of XYZ who determined that our study did not need ethical approval. The published work will directly reflect the quality of the artwork provided. Invite the authors to revise and resubmit their manuscript to address specific concerns. If identifying characteristics are altered to protect anonymity, such as in genetic profiles, authors should provide assurance that alterations do not distort meaning. List at the end of the paper in consecutive order. Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts.
Plastic Surgeon Or Dermatologist For Mole Removal,
Articles M